The Independent’s journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Study suggests patient may have survived surgical intervention, at least for a few months
Find your bookmarks in your Independent Premium section, under my profile
Skull in which the evidence was found, at the El Pendón site
Evidence of the earliest ear surgery performed on a human was found by archaeologists in Spain in a skull that dates back to about 5,300 years.
Researchers, including those from the University of Valladolid in Spain, analysed the skull that was unearthed in 2018 at the Dolmen of El Pendónis – a dig site near Burgos city, believed to have been used by early humans as a funeral chamber.
The study, published last week in the journal Scientific Reports, found two bilateral perforations in the skull on both mastoid bones, located just behind the ear.
These bones contain mastoid air cells and are thought to protect the delicate structures of the ear, regulate ear pressure and also protect the skull’s temporal bone during trauma.
Scientists found signs that the skull may have undergone mastoidectomy – a surgical procedure likely performed to relieve the pain the prehistoric individual in question may have suffered due to inflammation.
Cut marks on one side of the left ear indicate surgical intervention was performed on the individual – likely a woman between 35 and 50 years old who had also survived the surgery for at least a few months, according to scientists.
“Furthermore, the results of this paper demonstrate the survival of the individual to both interventions,” they said in the study.
The surgery likely performed may have been a mastoidectomy, done to clean out the infected area behind the ear.
If left untreated, infection in this part of the skull is known to spread to the mastoid bone, the honeycomb-like structure of which may fill up with infected material and break down.
This is known to cause serious, sometimes life-threatening, health complications such as hearing loss, blood clot, meningitis or a brain abscess.
“These infections are often caused by the proliferation of bacteria or other pathogens in the middle ear,” the scientists wrote in the study.
In this prehistoric context, scientists said the person’s ear disease may have been detectable as the infection presents itself as a “fluctuating and painful” growth on the ear.
“In this case, the prehistoric surgeon located the focus of the problem — probably because the infection was evident to the naked eye — and successfully intervened, as proven by the bone regeneration observed in both mastoid bones,” they added.
Researchers said mastoidectomy was a relatively common surgical procedure to treat middle-ear infection in the pre-antibiotic era.
First descriptions of mastoid surgery date back to the 17th century, said scientists.
Such surgeries were implemented by Johannes Riolanus the Younger, and the earliest documented evidence of mastoidectomy comes from the island of Thassos during the Proto-Byzantine period, the researchers pointed out.
With earlier studies indicating that the site was used for about 800 years, between 3,800 and 3,000 BC, archaeologists said the find “would be the earliest surgical ear intervention in the history of mankind.”
As part of the surgery, the study said the patient’s skull was likely subject to progressive circular and abrasive drilling, causing “unbearable pain.”
Researchers said the woman may have been strongly restrained by other community members or previously administered some psychotropic substance like opium or hyoscyamine to relieve the pain.
Archaeologists, however, said it was difficult to conclusively determine the type of tool used to remove the bone tissue, adding that it may have most likely been a sharp instrument with a circular movement.
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
{{#verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}} {{^verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}}
By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.
Already have an account? sign in
By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
{{#verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}} {{^verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}}
By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.
Already have an account? sign in
By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Skull in which the evidence was found, at the El Pendón site
Scientific Reports (2022) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06223-6
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in Please refresh your browser to be logged in
Or if you would prefer: